This Stage used 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese synthetic intelligence business that establishes open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the business in 2023 and works as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 design supplies actions comparable to other contemporary big language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a substantially lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of an equivalent LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were established in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to restrict the capability of these 2 countries to establish innovative AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its first totally free chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share price to stop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against bigger and more recognized rivals has been explained as « upending AI », [8] constituting « the very first chance at what is becoming a worldwide AI area race », [11] and introducing « a brand-new age of AI brinkmanship ». [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, designs, and training information open-source, allowing its code to be easily offered for usage, modification, viewing, and designing documents for building purposes. [13] The company supposedly strongly hires young AI researchers from leading Chinese universities, [8] and hires from outside the computer science field to diversify its designs’ understanding and abilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading considering that the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while participating in Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on establishing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer exclusively utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative expert system chatbot open source, implying its code is freely offered for usage, modification, and viewing. This consists of authorization to access and utilize the source code, in addition to style files, for building purposes. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had actually built up a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip limitations on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer started a synthetic basic intelligence laboratory committed to research developing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s financial service. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the lab became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital firms were unwilling in providing financing as it was unlikely that it would be able to create an exit in a short duration of time. [15]

After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong efficiency for a low rate, DeepSeek became known as the catalyst for China’s AI design cost war. It was rapidly dubbed the « Pinduoduo of AI », and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the cost of their AI models to compete with the company. Despite the low cost charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its competitors that were losing money. [20]

DeepSeek is concentrated on research study and has no detailed prepare for commercialization; [20] this likewise allows its technology to prevent the most stringent provisions of China’s AI policies, such as requiring consumer-facing innovation to adhere to the government’s controls on details. [3]

DeepSeek’s working with choices target technical abilities instead of work experience, resulting in most brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or designers whose AI professions are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the company recruits people with no computer technology background to help its innovation comprehend other topics and understanding locations, consisting of having the ability to create poetry and carry out well on the notoriously tough Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its first series of design, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available for totally free to both scientists and commercial users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license arrangement (« DeepSeek license ») regarding « open and responsible downstream usage » for the model itself. [21]

They are of the very same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series consists of 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of direction data. This produced the .

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B specifications in both Base and Chat types (no Instruct was released). It was developed to take on other LLMs readily available at the time. The paper claimed benchmark outcomes greater than most open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was essentially the very same as those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the 2 Base designs was likewise released simultaneously, acquired by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B criteria (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was basically the same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed equivalent efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a version of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with « shared specialists » that are constantly queried, and « routed specialists » that may not be. They found this to help with skilled balancing. In basic MoE, some professionals can end up being excessively depended on, while other specialists might be seldom used, squandering criteria. Attempting to balance the specialists so that they are similarly utilized then triggers professionals to duplicate the exact same capacity. They proposed the shared experts to discover core capacities that are typically utilized, and let the routed professionals to learn the peripheral capabilities that are seldom utilized. [28]

In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K mathematics problems and their tool-use-integrated detailed options. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The reward model was a process reward design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd technique. [30] This reward model was then utilized to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics questions « associated to GSM8K and MATH ». The benefit design was constantly upgraded during training to prevent benefit hacking. This led to the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series consists of 4 models, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 larger models were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in two phases. The very first stage was trained to solve math and coding issues. This stage utilized 1 reward model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The 2nd phase was trained to be helpful, safe, and follow guidelines. This stage utilized 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and security reward models were trained on human choice data. The rule-based benefit design was manually set. All experienced reward designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the released version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They went with 2-staged RL, because they discovered that RL on reasoning data had « unique qualities » different from RL on basic information. For example, RL on thinking might enhance over more training steps. [31]

The 2 V2-Lite models were smaller, and qualified likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite variation to help « further research and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE ». [31]

Architecturally, the V2 models were significantly modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the standard attention system by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and utilized the mix of experts (MoE) alternative formerly published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was cheaper than its peers with a price of 2 RMB for every single million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they released 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline information, then combined with a guideline dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for math problems was computed by comparing to the ground-truth label. The benefit for code problems was created by a reward model trained to anticipate whether a program would pass the system tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they launched a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is essentially the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mainly English and Chinese. It contained a greater ratio of math and programs than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of thinking (mathematics, programming, logic) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, easy concern answering) information. Reasoning information was generated by « expert designs ». Non-reasoning information was generated by DeepSeek-V2.5 and checked by humans. – The « professional designs » were trained by starting with an unspecified base design, then SFT on both information, and synthetic data produced by an internal DeepSeek-R1 model. The system prompt asked the R1 to reflect and confirm during thinking. Then the expert models were RL utilizing an unspecified benefit function.
– Each expert model was trained to create simply synthetic thinking data in one specific domain (math, shows, logic).
– Expert models were used, rather of R1 itself, because the output from R1 itself suffered « overthinking, bad format, and excessive length ».

4. Model-based benefit models were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice data consisting of both last benefit and chain-of-thought resulting in the last benefit. The benefit design produced benefit signals for both concerns with unbiased but free-form responses, and questions without objective responses (such as imaginative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both benefit designs and rule-based benefit. The rule-based reward was calculated for mathematics problems with a last response (put in a box), and for programs problems by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek group carried out comprehensive low-level engineering to accomplish performance. They used mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the basic 32-bit, needing unique GEMM routines to collect accurately. They utilized a custom 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They decreased the communication latency by overlapping extensively calculation and communication, such as committing 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU communication. They lowered interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the exact device each professional was on in order to prevent certain machines being queried regularly than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing techniques. [37]

After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 outshined Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being accessible by means of DeepSeek’s API, along with via a chat interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible inference, mathematical thinking, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek claimed that it went beyond efficiency of OpenAI o1 on benchmarks such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it utilized 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached a service quicker than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business also launched some « DeepSeek-R1-Distill » designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial information produced by R1. [47]

A discussion in between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant first believes about the thinking process in the mind and after that supplies the user with the answer. The reasoning process and response are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning process here answer here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained exclusively utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they utilized no model-based reward. All benefit functions were rule-based, « generally » of 2 types (other types were not specified): accuracy benefits and format benefits. Accuracy benefit was inspecting whether a boxed response is right (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for programs). Format benefit was examining whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has problems with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to deal with these issues and more improve reasoning: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on « thousands » of « cold-start » data all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL procedure as R1-Zero, however likewise with a « language consistency benefit » to encourage it to react monolingually. This produced an internal model not released.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking data from the internal model, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the generated reasoning had a wrong last response, then it is removed). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K artificial data for 2 epochs.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based benefit (for thinking tasks) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K information synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar way as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and responses

DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had exceeded ChatGPT as the highest-rated complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot supposedly answers concerns, fixes logic problems and composes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI business. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 uses substantially fewer resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as many as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to require only about 2,000 GPUs, particularly the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta spent developing its latest AI technology. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at fairly minimal expense has been acknowledged as potentially challenging the worldwide supremacy of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a « Sputnik moment » for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 design was reportedly « on par with » among OpenAI’s most current designs when used for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen likewise explained R1 as « AI’s Sputnik minute ». [51]

DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media commonly praised DeepSeek as a nationwide property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with professionals and asked him to supply opinions and ideas on a draft for comments of the annual 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of limited resources has highlighted prospective limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI development, which include export limitations on advanced AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI designs consequently « stimulated market chaos » [57] and triggered shares in major worldwide innovation business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech companies also sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] An international selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 design, had actually resulted in tape losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of value was wiped off American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had combined reactions to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are involved in the United States government-backed « Stargate Project » to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek « super impressive ». [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed suspicion of the app’s efficiency or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to use the design in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its brand-new user registration to contact number from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a « massive » cyberattack disrupted the proper functioning of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have actually observed that the main application programs interface (API) variation of R1, which runs from servers found in China, utilizes censorship systems for topics that are considered politically delicate for the federal government of China. For example, the model refuses to answer concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may initially generate an answer, but then deletes it shortly afterwards and replaces it with a message such as: « Sorry, that’s beyond my present scope. Let’s speak about something else. » [72] The integrated censorship mechanisms and constraints can just be gotten rid of to a restricted extent in the open-source version of the R1 model. If the « core socialist values » specified by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, discussions are terminated. [74] When checked by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as « an inalienable part of China’s area, » and stated: « We securely oppose any kind of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are committed to attaining the total reunification of the motherland through tranquil methods. » [75] In January 2025, Western researchers had the ability to trick DeepSeek into providing certain answers to some of these topics by requesting in its response to swap certain letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some experts fear that the government of China might use the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading out disinformation, security and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy conditions state « We save the information we gather in protected servers found in individuals’s Republic of China … We may gather your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you offer to our design and Services ». Although the information storage and collection policy is consistent with ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired short article reports this as security concerns. [80] In action, the Italian information security authority is looking for extra details on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of personal data, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had actually started a nationwide security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government prohibited the usage of DeepSeek at government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened an inquiry into DeepSeek’s usage of individual details. [83]

Artificial intelligence industry in China.

Notes

^ a b c The variety of heads does not equivalent the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed choosing « Deep Think allowed », and every user could use it just 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). « China’s cheap, open AI design DeepSeek delights scientists ». Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). « The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world prepared to blow ». The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). « How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Competing With Silicon Valley Giants ». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). « DeepSeek’s more affordable models and weaker chips cast doubt on trillions in AI infrastructure spending ». Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). « Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may hit India’s AI ambitions ». The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). « Nvidia investigation signals expanding of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly ». Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). « Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe ». BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). « What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.? ». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). « China’s DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you should know ». CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). « What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to drop? ». CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). « Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants ». ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). « Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I. » The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). « ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key ». Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). « How a top Chinese AI model got rid of US sanctions ». MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). « Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker ». ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). « Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I. » CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023). » [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says ». Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). « Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI designs are trained ». South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). « The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer ». Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). « Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race ». ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ « DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder ». GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ « DeepSeek Coder ». deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ « deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face ». huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ « config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary ». huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ « config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main ». huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ « deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face ». huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ « config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary ». huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). « Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design outshines Meta, OpenAI products ». South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). « DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outshines Llama and Qwen on launch ». VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). « DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model seems one of the very best ‘open’ oppositions yet ». TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ « Deepseek Log in page ». DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ « News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged thinking power! ». DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). « DeepSeek’s very first reasoning design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance ». VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). « Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast ». The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ « Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce ». GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs by means of Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ « Chinese AI startup DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store ». Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). « American AI has actually reached its Sputnik minute ». The Hill. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). « ‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese company reveals AI chatbot » – via The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). « Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets ». BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). « What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business ». CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ « DeepSeek poses an obstacle to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley ». The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). « Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states ». Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). « 量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了 » AI界拼多多 » ». finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). « Chinese AI company’s AI design development highlights limitations of US sanctions ». Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ « DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot triggers US market chaos, wiping $500bn off Nvidia ». BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). « Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap ». Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). « DeepSeek triggers international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth ». Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). « DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical ». Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). « Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek’s open-source AI as « super outstanding »: « We must take the developments out of China really, very seriously » ». Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). « OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘impressive' ». The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). « Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide ». The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). « Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development « favorable » ». Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). « China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street » – by means of NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). « Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s disruption ». Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ « Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests massive Nvidia GPU infrastructure ». Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. « Big AWS consumers, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models ». Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). « DeepSeek hit with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores ». The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. « DeepSeek temporarily limited brand-new sign-ups, mentioning ‘massive malicious attacks' ». Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). « Chinese AI has actually sparked a $1 trillion panic – and it doesn’t appreciate free speech ». The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). « DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot ». Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). « We checked out DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ « The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, development and the increase of turmoil ». The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). « Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, giving the AI race its ‘Sputnik minute' ». NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). « China’s DeepSeek AI positions formidable cyber, information personal privacy threats ». Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). « Experts advise caution over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). « DeepSeek’s success has actually painted a huge TikTok-shaped target on its back ». LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ « Privacy policy ». Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). « DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China ». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ « Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on information security ». Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). « White House assesses impact of China AI app DeepSeek on national security, official states ». Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.